Where Real Estate Gets Its Dirt

The ground is shifting below us.

24-Science-NZealand_486271eI was thinking how fitting that NAR’s conference and expo is being held in San Francisco this week. Not only a hub for technology and innovation but San Francisco is a place where the ground literally shakes from time to time. And things in real estate are getting shaken up.

The combined market cap of Zillow and Trulia is about 3 billion dollars.

The Really Alliance has all but declared war on MLS providers (or not).

A few MLS providers have stopped syndicating listing thru ListHub (more on the way?).

and nobody likes their MLS system (who knew??).

Is there anything solid that we can hold on to? What’s a poor vendor or MLS provider to do in such a unbalanced world? What’s the “new normal”?

I don’t have the answers but, I’m optimistic about the future, and San Francisco is as good a place to start to look for answers as anywhere. My search begins tomorrow. See you there.

Reciprocal Deep Linking. Is it the future of MLS data sharing?

California has always been a hot bed of MLS politics and a place of innovation, when it comes to sharing MLS data.

Remember the MLS Alliance? How about Mercado? CARETS is still going strong. Quattro ring a bell? And who could forget the calREDD disaster? It seems whenever MLS providers want to share data, politics get in the way. But a group of MLS professionals believe they have the answer to change the way MLS providers share data, without the politics.

MetroList Services, Inc., i-Tech MLS, Rapattoni and MOVE announced earlier this month a new way, using MOVE’s Find application, to share listing detail records from the source MLS system. They do this with reciprocal deep linking, I’m calling it RDL.

To be honest when I first read the press release I was a bit nonplussed. Seemed just like another MLS data share agreement. But the twist on this is subtle. Using Find and SSO its possible for a MLS member in Sacramento to view the actual MLS property detail page on any cooperating MLS provider’s system. But here the brilliant part, the only thing that each MLS provider must agree to is an offer of cooperation and compensation. Boom.

Here’s a few screen shot to show you how it works:

RDL 1
SSO to Find from within participating MLS system.

RDL 2
Property Search results on Find. Click on the Property Address to display the Find Detail page.

RDL 3
On Find detail page, click on ‘View details on i-Tech’ (cooperating MLS system.)

RDL 4
i-Tech (cooperating MLS system) MLS property detail sheet displays.

Tom Beede, CEO of MetroList Services put it this way, “Reciprocal deep linking is the most cost-effective way to provide real estate agents with access to confidential information on for sale properties, because it’s free.”

Granted there are a few integration points that must be handled, but MOVE, Rapattoni, MetroList Services and i-Tech have already proven the model. Is this the future? Time will tell. The best thing is seeing MLS professionals continue to drive innovation to help them seek solutions to their challenges.

Did you hear?

I’ve been super busy and there has been a lot of news to catch up on. Here’s a few links to stories I think are worth checking out…

Bob Gottesman has been selected as RESOs new Executive Director, effective May 2013. Check out Matt Cohen’s Live Blog transcript to see this and all the RESO Spring Meeting news.

Todd Carpenter’s new site Realty Nex.us is fast becoming one of my favorite industy sites. He recently published a “Special Report” – “Why online consumers love Zillow and Trulia more than you.” It’s free and worth the read. I’ve also added the link to the my “Read This Now!” header.

Speaking of special reports Rob Hahn’s (aka The Notorious R.O.B.) has another report, “[PREMIUM] Move, Trulia, Zillow: Q1/2013 Report – The Narratives Take Shape”. You need to be a premium subscriber to access the content. I haven’t had a chance to read this one yet (you know you need to carve out a big of time for Rob), but his first two Premium reports were excellent.

And if you really need to get caught up on the MLS public facing website debate look further than Inman News for great content and discussion.

Ever heard of the Dymaxion House? How about a conveyor belt linen closet? Now you have.


[via SWISS-MISS]

Solid Earth’s Spring has sprung

Solid Earth Delivers Spring Public Portal in the Chattanooga, TN Market

“The Spring platform is a new kind of public­facing search portal that represents a number of key advances in the real estate industry. Traditionally, there are separate search environments for consumers and professionals. Using distinct consumer and professional logins, Spring offers professionals the same proprietary access to information, analytics and features they currently have but within the same navigation experience as their clients.”

Looks like Solid Earth is swinging for the fences here. It acts as both and public and private portal, responsive design, the works. I can only imagine the level of development effort to get this thing ready. It’s a very interesting value proposition, looking forward to see how the market responds. Congrats to Solid Earth.

Lead Ambiguity

One of the favorite vendor pastimes is trying to solve “the big problems” in online real estate today. This happens in hallway conversations, lobby bars, or big plush chairs in hotel lobbies. One of the biggest topics is the fact that most agents don’t respond to leads. Who cares if your site has tons of traffic, if the leads it generates don’t get responded to? And if you are selling products to agents that claim to generate leads then you have a bigger problem. Retention.

Typically the conversation ends in a head shake, a swirl of the adult beverage you’ve been sipping on, and the muttering…

“Stupid agents”.

I got a call from Dave Howe from MetroList Services in Sacramento. Dave has been in the MLS business longer than most. He’s seen vendors come and go through his market for many, many, years. I fondly call him the “hardest working man in the MLS business”. Anyway Dave wanted to chat and said to me, “You know I’ve come to realize, it’s more important to brand a lead “trusted” to an agent, than it is to brand a listing “trusted” to a consumer”. In a Yogi Bearish type of way Dave was on to something.

But how do you brand a lead “trusted”, or maybe a better word is “legitimate”? Most lead notification comes via email, and you can’t really brand a subject line.

After a bit of back and forth what we came to was that the problem really wasn’t “stupid agents” not responding to leads, but the shear amount of other email filling their inboxes that causes the agent to be distracted. I’m not talking about the “mickey mouse” or “john doe” leads, there will always be those. What I’m more talking about is the desensitization agents get from the promotional email they get from vendors promising them leads/services. Sometimes they can be from the very vendor who they are paying to receive leads from trying to upsell them to a another package.

There have been several solutions to this problem, most of them center on the broker (i.e. Weichert) taking over the lead follow up process and doling out the leads to paying/qualified agents. But the problem still remains for a vast amount of agents wanting to sign up for these lead generation services directly. It’s a huge opportunity.

But it’s time to change the premise of the argument. We (vendors) are so compelled to upsell agents to the next column of products and services we forgot the rules of any long term relationship. We need to establish trust first, then deliver on what we promised. If we do that, the rest will follow.

The big problem in online real estate isn’t just the agents not responding to leads (or using your product), it’s stupid vendors who want to jump from first base to third base too quickly.

NAR REach program: “shady and predatory”

This accelerator charges its companies $25,000. That’s just wrong — right?

“And it’s why it’s surprising that REach, the just-launched accelerator program from the National Association of Realtors, charges its companies as much as $25,000 to participate in the program. The fact was conveniently left out of my briefing on the program for this story, and since I learned about the fee, I’ve asked several accelerators if they’ve ever heard of such a practice.

The answer was a universal “no,” with the only other comparable example being 500 Startups. That accelerator charges companies a program fee of $6000 per founder and $3000 per non-founder (the average cost for companies is $12,000 to $15,000, I’m told), but 500 Startups also invests $50,000 in each startup for a five percent equity stake, meaning the companies alway net positive. The consensus among industry people I talked to was that an arrangement that charges companies and takes equity with zero capital invested seemed shady and predatory. Some even equated it to the much-maligned pay-to-pitch events that take advantage of desperate startups’ need to get in front of investors.”

There was always something that bothered me about NAR’s angle on this. PandoDaily nails it.

What’s an “App”?

It’s not a web app. It’s an app you install from the web.

We received an email…

“I heard about Forecast, but I couldn’t find it in the App Store. How do I get it?”

“You don’t get it from the App Store: just go to http://forecast.io/ on your phone, and you’ll be given instructions on how to download it.”

“Wow, this is great! I didn’t know you could get apps outside the App Store!”

We’ve had conversations like this dozens of times since launching Forecast. They usually comes from people who have an iPhone but aren’t particularly tech savvy, and I’m fairly certain none of them will ever know that Forecast is actually a web app. To them, it’s just an app you install from the web.

Great insight in to the whole native vs. web app debate. You should also check out Forecast, its my favorite weather app and its not available on iTunes.

via @danwoolley

Zillow as Craigslist

Zillow: The most comprehensive list of real estate for sale in America.

“In addition, we all know that every house is for sale. As a consumer, what better place is there to research homes that are not on the market? It doesn’t matter if the data is perfect. As a consumer, it’s the *best* I can find. Go ahead and tell me the data sucks. I don’t care. My bet is, neither do many of your customers.”

Spot on analysis from Todd. Looks like he doesn’t care to “find it first“. Also, I wonder why he used Zillow in his analysis instead of Trulia?

CRMLS MLS System Conversion – A lesson in social media

Keep-calm-and-carry-onWhat happens when the largest MLS in the country shuts down one MLS system and moves everyone to another? Chaos!

We all know the acronym, “RDR”, or Realtors Don’t Read. This is what faced CRMLS as it began moving it’s members off the Tempo MLS system on to its preferred MLS System, Matrix.

But so far I have to say I’m been super impressed with how CRMLS is leveraging social media (Facebook and Twitter) to reach out to its members and solve problems as they come up. If you haven’t already, go to Facebook and like the CRMLS Facebook Page. Sure some agents are upset and will complain but just look at how quickly CRMLS staff is repsonding to inquires and also isolating problems. They are on it like Blue Bonnet!

We all know the horror stories of what happens when agents start their own social media campaigns against the MLS, but it seems that CRMLS has learned those lessons and has a bit to teach the rest of us. Well done guys!

See you in New York City!

Well, after a brief hiatus I’m back to keeping the world safe! On that note I Just wanted to let everyone know that I’ll be attending the Inman Real Estate Connect conference in New York City next week. I’ve also been asked to moderate the “Technology Track” on Thursday. I’ve got a superstar list of panelists and I hope you guys will come and check us out!

strong>Thursday January 17, 20031:15PM to 2:00PM

Technology case study
How to design software agents will buy — and use.

Susan Daimler, Co-Founder, Buyfolio
Matt Daimler, Co-Founder, Buyfolio
Moderator: Greg Robertson, Co-Founder, W&R Studios

2:05PM to 2:50PM

Technology best practice forum
Mission Impossible? How to market and sell real estate software

Steve Allen from UtahRealEstate.com
Mike Sparr, CEO and Founder, Goomzee
Dan Stewart, Founder, Happy Grasshopper
Moderator: Greg Robertson, Co-Founder, W&R Studios

2:55PM to 3:40PM

Technology case study
Innovating on a new platform for old use cases

Tony Cappaert, Co-Founder and CEO, Contactually
Caren Maio, Co-Founder and CEO, Nestio
Moderator: Greg Robertson, Co-Founder, W&R Studios

3:45 pm – 4:30 pm

Technology best practice forum
Overcoming the MLS hurdle: how to get the data and get to market

Mike Wurzer, President, FBS/Spark Platform
Seth Price, Director of Sales and Real Estate Marketing, Placester
Andy Woolley, Vice President, Homes.com
Moderator: Greg Robertson, Co-Founder, W&R Studios

Sponsored By MLS Reset